LGBTQIA+ Coalition
Learn more
Coalition is how liberation was built
“LGB without the T” isn’t a neutral preference — it’s a divide-and-isolate strategy. And history is very clear: LGBTQIA+ rights moved forward when we protected each other, not when we threw the smallest group under the bus.
What coalition looks like in real history
- 1966 — Compton’s Cafeteria Riot (San Francisco): Transgender women and drag queens fought back against police harassment years before Stonewall — a watershed moment that helped shape modern LGBTQ resistance.
- 1969 — Stonewall (New York City): The uprising became a milestone that accelerated the modern LGBTQ rights movement — and it was powered by a cross-section of the community, including gender-nonconforming and trans people.
- 1970s — Mutual aid + organizing: Activists like Sylvia Rivera and Marsha P. Johnson helped found STAR and created STAR House to support unhoused queer and trans youth — coalition in action, not theory.
- Today — shared legal stakes: Court fights over “sex” discrimination affect everyone. The same legal framework that protects trans people has also protected gay and lesbian workers.
How to say it: “You don’t have to personally ‘get’ trans people to see this: dividing marginalized groups is how rights get rolled back.”
Celebrate the truth: trans people helped build the modern movement
Trans and gender-nonconforming people weren’t “late additions.” They were there in the street-level fights, in the early organizing, in care networks and mutual aid, and in the push for nondiscrimination protections — even when mainstream organizations tried to sideline them.
- Visibility and resistance: Street harassment and policing hit gender-nonconforming people especially hard — which is why so many were on the front lines of early resistance.
- Organizing under pressure: Rivera’s work after Stonewall included organizing for nondiscrimination, while also facing rejection from parts of the movement — a reminder that coalition is a choice we must keep making.
- Care as activism: STAR House is a concrete example: housing, food, safety, and community — built for the people most abandoned by systems.
Alternative ways to say it: “Even if you only care about LGB rights, weakening protections for one group makes all protections easier to attack later.”
Why “LGB without the T” is a trap
- It narrows the circle: Once a movement accepts “some of us don’t count,” it teaches opponents exactly where to press next.
- It misunderstands shared rights: Anti-discrimination law often turns on how “sex” is defined. Narrowing “sex” harms trans people immediately — and destabilizes protections that LGB people rely on too.
- It rewrites our origin story: Efforts to erase trans people from LGBTQ history are not accidental; they’re a political move to make today’s exclusion feel “normal.”
Gentle extra: Some people know they’re gay early — that’s widely accepted now. The question is simple: why wouldn’t some transgender kids know who they are, too?
Questions that invite reflection
- “Who benefits when a coalition breaks apart?”
- “If rights can be rolled back for one group, what stops the rollback from spreading?”
- “What would it look like to protect people you don’t fully understand yet?”